According to PASE v. Hannon, what is the view on intelligence tests for black students?

The context of PASE v. Hannon highlights the critical examination of the use of standardized intelligence tests, particularly in relation to different racial and ethnic groups. In this case, the ruling found that while the use of intelligence tests is applicable in certain contexts, this does not imply that they are inherently biased toward one group over another. The court acknowledged that standardized tests could have utility in evaluating general cognitive abilities, but this acceptance is nuanced.

The correct choice reflects the position that intelligence tests can be part of the assessment process for determining placement in educational programs, including those for students with mild to moderate disabilities. However, it is also important to note the ongoing discussions surrounding cultural fairness and the potential impacts of socioeconomic factors on test performance. The ruling does not categorically dismiss the validity of these tests but emphasizes the importance of using them judiciously alongside other assessment tools to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of a student's capabilities.

The other options present views that either categorically reject the use of intelligence tests or call for significant revisions based on cultural context, which are areas of ongoing debate but do not fully encapsulate the court's findings in this specific case.