What did the Timothy W. v. Rochester, NH School District case affirm regarding children with disabilities?

The Timothy W. v. Rochester, NH School District case is significant because it reinforced the principle that all children with disabilities are entitled to a free appropriate public education (FAPE) regardless of the severity of their disabilities. This case highlighted that education should be provided based on the individual needs of the child rather than assumptions about their potential for benefit. As a result, educational programs must be available to every child with a disability, ensuring that the focus is on providing appropriate services that can support their learning and development. This ruling is a critical affirmation of the rights of students with disabilities, affirming that their access to education cannot be contingent on perceived limitations or disruptions they may cause.

In contrast, the other options suggest limitations on the educational rights of children with disabilities, such as the idea that educators could determine the necessity of programs based on expected benefit or behavior, which contradicts the ruling established in this case. Additionally, being restricted to specialized schools or denied access to programs based on disruptive behavior would undermine the fundamental goal of inclusive education as mandated by law.