What is a key ruling in the Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District case regarding parochial schools?

The ruling in the Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District case emphasizes that services must be provided in a religiously neutral manner. This decision clarified that public funding for special education services in parochial schools does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as long as the services themselves do not advance or promote religious beliefs. The key aspect of this ruling is the notion of neutrality; it permits public educational support for students with disabilities while ensuring that such support does not intertwine with the religious mission of the school. This principle helps to balance the right of students with disabilities to access necessary services while maintaining the separation of church and state in educational settings.