What obligation does a school district have if it fails to provide a free, appropriate public education, according to Kevin T. v. Elmhurst Community School District No. 205?

Prepare for the Indiana Special Needs Mild Intervention Test. Study with interactive quizzes, flashcards, and detailed explanations to boost your confidence. Ace your exam with our comprehensive resources!

In the case of Kevin T. v. Elmhurst Community School District No. 205, the court addressed the responsibilities of school districts in ensuring that students with disabilities receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE). When a school district fails to meet this obligation, it is required to continue providing educational services until the student reaches the age of 22. This ruling emphasizes the legal duty of schools to support students with special needs beyond the typical age of graduation if they have not received a sufficiently appropriate education.

Providing education until the age of 22 ensures that students who require additional time and support to develop their skills have the opportunity to do so. This aligns with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which mandates that states provide educational services to eligible students until they are no longer eligible, generally at age 22. The decision reinforces the idea that education for students with disabilities is not just a right but a necessity for their future success, extending their learning opportunities even after traditional educational timelines have concluded.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy